from "international community" is always the question if individual countries are not the to bow to the dictates of greedy globalists. Usually is, these countries are resource-owning, headed by dictators, are just as eager to suck the people, as the globalists to which the individual potentates sometimes not enough to throw in the neck.
The globalists have have a "geopolitical" interests of the countries of the raw materials. to get
To access and of course free availability of these raw materials are of the globally active and established very greedy foreign financiers generally corrupt domestic "tribal leader" or "politicians" in the raw material possessing countries to erkleckliches a penny to their private accounts, the globalists, the free availability guarantee.
In most cases, provide the globalists, the "tribal leaders" and "politicians" very readily with weapons and military equipment, a precaution in the event that the common people a day if it because of the large cake also at least like to have the crumbs, can be prevented by force of arms from trying to attract these crumbs.
In general this system works well, usually over decades.
The "tribal leader" and "politicians' bunker to them by the globalists surrendered billions in working worldwide banking systems, which of course includes the globalists.
Practically, this system of globalists. The billions they pay remain directly in their pockets worldwide and if the "dictators" and "politicians" one day have also become too greedy, create the globalists it again and again, causing the raw material possessing countries chaos and the respective people against "dictators" or "politicians" to incite, and already occurs, the "world community" as an alibi in action at all "assets" of the "dictators" and "politicians" in to the banks, which anyway are the globalists, lock.
Such a system has to come up with for now.
But back to the question of who are the globalists?
At least these are first of all to people with very, very much money and as much global influence as well as an abundance of power, of who takes the normal person does not even know it to the extent they exist at all. These are the people who have the money to have that as the small saver, the world through windy, chatted up financial transactions during the last "crisis" lost, now in their pockets. These are the people of all misfortunes of others always earn billions, whether by war, armed conflict, through oil spills or shipping accidents, through revolution, murder and manslaughter in any part of this world.
Since these people are never in public, they invented the "world community".
This "world community" suggests to the ordinary people, at least, the mass of all who inhabit the earth are for or against something, and what decent person even for war or exploitation of others? This suggests at the same time, the "world community" always the decent ones are
So this "world community" is currently that of the Libyan, previous leader, billions in foreign banks (which include the globalists) frozen. The same is true of course for the billions of the previous Egyptian leader, and of course for the billions of existing Tunisian officer and all global despots before them. Remember what? No?
then consider it a try!
is now the "world community" called to do something to uaden resource-owning countries and to help their people. They realize something now? Still not?
So, now the globalists mean by "world community," U.S., yes, we all need, in Europe, USA and elsewhere, now WE ALL pay to help these people. Of course, through taxes, we all have to apply. You see, this is how this
When it comes to revenue, the globalists mean by "world community" itself and as they operate internationally, they have not even wrong. But when it comes to the payment, say the globalists U.S. exclusively with "world community".
What do the people in Europe, USA or elsewhere, with the countries to do now as North Africa? What a "World Community" arrogate to themselves to decide what the people now as in North Africa to do, or may not do? Which "world community" is at war in Afghanistan or Iraq? The majority of humanity? Who?
Which "world community" has the right to determine which country is run like?
And what "world community" to presume to decide who has to live under what political system?
For the "world community" of the globalists is a country only as long as interesting, as you can move most effectively exploit or otherwise benefit from it.
The real world population, whether in Europe, Asia, U.S. or anywhere else is faced with security not as responsible for the terrible effects on the individual countries in which raged for the globalists have their billions in profits and continue to rage.
0 comments:
Post a Comment